Much has been made in recent days about the proposed mosque some two blocks from Ground Zero (The site of the September, 11th attacks). The proposal by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf has struck a chord with the American public. And rightfully so! However, we must be certain that it is striking the right chord.
Now, it must be said that there is sufficient room for debate on the relativity of religious freedom these days. And it may be pointed out also that the congregation and leadership of the Orthodox Church building that was destroyed on September 11th have been caught up in the mire of bureaucratic red tape. And those who seem to be running to defend the right of Imam Rauf to construct his mosque haven’t said or done much to aid this church. But I digress! Much of the media, talking heads and politicians have spoken at length about the constitutionality of the situation. This in my mind is somewhat surprising because scarcely anyone talks about the constitution nowadays, especially on the left, and it was likely quite a chore to find their respective copies or send an aid to buy a new one. But in reality this isn’t a question of whether the proposed mosque is constitutional! To me that particular topic is meant only to mislead the public.
As far as I am concerned the Imam has every right to build his mosque anywhere he desires provided that it meat the zoning codes and all the rest. There is no legal issue at play here and no room for there to be any legal hindrance of the mosque. Now before you go all crazy on me and start talking about the funding the intent and all of that, hear me out. I am simply saying the government does not have a dog in this fight, at least for the present. It is true that if we do indeed discover that funds linked to terrorist’s organizations or other entities that support them are being used to build this mosque then this becomes a different issue entirely. However, while we are on the subject, the fact that the US State department is paying at least part of the expenses for Imam Rauf to travel to the middle east to “foster ‘greater understanding’ about Islam and Muslim communities in the United States” is somewhat constitutional questionable.(http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/10/tax-dollars-to-build-mosques/)
What is at issue here is propriety. If, as the Imam has said, the purpose of this mosque and cultural center is to build bridges and promote cultural diversity, then forcing the proposed mosque on a people who do not want it seems a strange way to go about encouraging peace and brotherhood. For instance, if I wanted to do something for a friend to help them out in some way, but they vehemently reject my offer, then it doesn’t help the situation if I force them to take it against their will. This in my mind is where the true debate lies.
We must look at the history and the possibility of more sinister motives behind the mosque. Historically Muslims have had a long standing tradition of building mosques on sacred or important sights of those whom they have conquered. (http://www.hudson-ny.org/1496/mosques-on-sacred-sites-of-defeated-enemies) The very name of the proposed Mosque, the “Cordoba House” suggests this. After the Muslim conquest of Spain in 784 they destroyed a Visigoth Church and erected the Great Mosque or Mezquita. Of course we are all aware of the Dome of the Rock which was built over the site of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem . There are many other occurrences of this sort throughout history. And even though this idea may have nothing to do with Imam Rauf’s proposed mosque it will certainly be seen by many of the “Radical Muslims” as a symbol of victory. They see themselves at war with the west, with the infidel (that’s me, and likely you). Having a shinny new multi million dollar mosque near ground zero would mark the spot of their greatest triumph over the west thus far.
Yet the government has very little authority to stop this mosque from being built on the grounds of propriety, and neither do we. At best we could attempt to persuade the Imam to consider another location, but such attempts so far have proved unsuccessful. In my opinion the proposed mosque will move forward and be built. So what then? Well in either case we must have our eyes open. We need to be aware of why it is that Imam Rauf is so determined to build the mosque on the site near the place where Muslim terrorist killed nearly 3000 innocent people especially when the vast majority of the people he is trying to reach out to appose the mosque. What is the real intent and purpose for the mosque? These questions are but a part of much larger questions about Islam in America (a topic for another time). We must move forward with our eyes opened in this whatever the outcome of this particular case may be.
